Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard arguments for two cases that seek to end affirmative action based on race in university admissions. It's not the first time the court has discussed the issue, and there are a lot of precedents to dig through. 🎓 In the 1978 Regents of the University of California v. Bakke case, the court ruled that the University of California's "quota system" along with the use of affirmative action policies to remedy the effects of racial discrimination was unconstitutional. 🎓 Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger in 2003 set the modern precedent. The court ruled admissions officers could consider the race of applicants so long as they did so in a "narrowly tailored" and individualized way. 🎓 In 2013 and 2016, Fisher v. University of Texas tried to overturn the Bakke and Grutter precedent, but failed. 🎓 The decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina will likely come down in 2023, as the court looks at whether any consideration of race in the college admissions process constitutes a violation of the Equal Protection Clause. |
No comments:
Post a Comment