The MoJo Daily newsletter, Monday through Friday.
The Supreme Court may have upended the right to choose, but the Justice Department is still trying to ensure that women who need abortions in life-threatening emergencies will be able to get them. Today, Attorney General Merrick Garland—who would be on the Supreme Court if it weren't for Mitch McConnell's machinations—announced that the DOJ was suing Idaho over a near-total abortion ban set to take effect this month. The state law, Garland said, violates a federal law, the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, that requires hospitals that receive Medicare funds to provide "necessary stabilizing treatment to patients who arrive at their emergency departments while experiencing a medical emergency." According to the lawsuit, "The Idaho law would make it a criminal offense for doctors to comply with EMTALA's requirement to provide stabilizing treatment, even where a doctor determines that abortion is the medical treatment necessary to prevent a patient from suffering severe health risks or even death." The DOJ suit is the Biden administration's first litigation aimed at counteracting a state's abortion restrictions. Meanwhile, voters in Kansas today will decide whether to remove an amendment to the state constitution that protects abortion access, providing one of the first major pieces of insight into popular sentiment around abortion post-Roe. —Abigail Weinberg |
|
|
Experts explain how to fight the virus—and sex-shaming—at the same time. |
|
|
The Singaporean leader implemented a unique vision of state control. Some Republicans want to see the same in the United States. |
BY ROBIN KAISER-SCHATZLEIN |
|
|
Support from readers allows Mother Jones to do journalism that doesn't just follow the pack. |
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment