Tuesday, 4 May 2021

How hateful rhetoric connects to real-world violence

How hateful rhetoric connects to real-world violence

President Biden’s commitment to diversity in the first 100 days

Posted: 03 May 2021 12:57 PM PDT

By Kathryn Dunn Tenpas, Ph.D

Short of dealing with a crisis, a president's largest responsibility at the start of an administration is to fill the highest levels of government with hand-picked appointees. Doing so enables the chief executive to steer the massive ship of state in the direction that advances their policy priorities. Throughout the 2020 presidential campaign, candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden repeatedly pledged to appoint a team that looked like America. Brookings has been monitoring this commitment by noting the pace, gender and race/ethnicity of his Senate-confirmed nominees, and we have now passed the 100th day of his tenure, a popular moment to take stock and assess personnel appointments.

Though the 100-day mark is an artificial milestone at best and is not predictive of future progress, it is a good time to note the pace and see where new leadership has taken the helm across the fifteen departments. Expectations during this period, however, should be tempered by the fact that the president's first 100 days are by no means equal to the Senate's first 100 days. For starters, the Senate was on recess for three weeks during the first 100 days. Excluding weekends and Fridays (since only one confirmation occurred on a Friday), there were approximately 47 days when the Senate could have confirmed President Biden's nominees. In short, the Senate's executive calendar has a profound impact on staffing the government.

A brief word about methodology: I relied primarily on Congress.gov to obtain confirmation information for all four presidents and utilized a variety of online resources and interviews to ascertain gender, race and ethnicity. I adopted the U.S. Census race/ethnicity categorization. Data only include confirmations to positions within the 15 departments (excluding U.S. Attorneys at the Department of Justice) during the first 100 days of the Bush, Obama, Trump and Biden administrations.

Gender and race/ethnicity: Just how diverse are these confirmed nominees?

Despite the relatively short window in which Biden nominees have been considered, the administration is holding true to their diversity commitment. As of the end of the 100th day, April 30, 2021 there were 30 confirmed nominees. Compared to President Biden's three predecessors, there was a higher proportion of women and non-whites.

Looking beyond the numbers, it is important to highlight that some of the nominations are historic firsts: the first Black to be the Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin; the first Native American, Deb Haaland, to be a Cabinet member and Secretary of Interior; the first woman, Janet Yellen, to be Secretary of the Treasury; and the first Latino and immigrant to run the Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas. These appointments are trail-blazing and pave the way for future women and minorities to assume the helm in positions that were previously unattainable. In short, the numbers alone do not shed light on the lasting impact of these appointments.

Pace: How quickly is the president staffing the government?

President Biden's pace of confirmations is nothing out of the ordinary. At the 100-day mark, the Biden administration has fewer confirmed nominees than President Obama, but close to President George W. Bush and has exceeded the progress of President Trump.

Though admittedly a small sample of appointees, the early numbers reveal President Biden's continued commitment to diversity and a pace that is comparable to two of his three predecessors. Much to the irritation of new presidents, they are indeed beholden to the Senate calendar when it comes to pace of confirmations and can only do so much. As of April 29, 2021, President Biden has nominated 198 individuals, demonstrating that while they have selected and vetted numerous appointees, their expectations of staffing the government must be tempered by the realities of the Senate calendar. The one bright spot on the horizon is that historically, the next 100-day period has been a far more productive confirmation period.

This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Making COVID-19 aid effective by doubling down on USAID reforms

Posted: 03 May 2021 12:10 PM PDT

By George Ingram, Justin Fugle

The Senate's bipartisan confirmation of Ambassador Samantha Power as administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has reenergized the agency and the entire development community. While the mission of USAID has notionally been valued alongside defense and diplomacy as contributing to national security, this is the first administration to grant the U.S. development leader a permanent seat on the National Security Council. It is a critical recognition that the perspectives of both USAID and the State Department are essential and distinct enough that both voices must be heard to optimize policymaking.

Along with overseeing USAID's $35 billion annual budget, a new and daunting challenge and exciting opportunity facing Administrator Power and her USAID colleagues is implementing some $5 billion for USAID's global COVID-19 response. In approving that funding, Congress granted the State Department and USAID an unusual degree of flexibility—both by avoiding narrow funding categories and legislative directives and by providing greater authority to transfer funds between accounts. This should allow development professionals closer to the ground to decide how and where the funds would be used most effectively and wider use of local organizations, procurement innovations such as co-creation, and the implementation reform of adaptive management.

Locally led development

Local governments and organizations are the most knowledgeable about the needs in their communities and the landscape for addressing those needs. A recent Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN) survey of USAID mission directors highlights the importance of working directly with local partners during the pandemic. With supply chains disrupted, international travel essentially stopped, and internal travel by noncitizens in conflict-affected countries restricted, U.S. assistance depends more on local organizations to manage the implementation and help communities protect health and economies. For example, in several instances, when schools closed, local partners assisted host-country governments and communities by developing reading and other education programs that were locally tailored and could be broadcast over the radio. In other places, missions were able to quickly disseminate COVID-19 messaging at the community level through existing local partnerships.

USAID has made progress in engaging local partners beyond COVID-19 response. Three years ago, USAID invested 35 percent of its funding under the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) directly to local partners, an amount that increased to 45 percent in the fiscal year 2019 Country Operational Plans (COP19). Current estimates show USAID will channel 53 percent of its PEPFAR funding to local partners in COP20, with a trajectory headed north of 60 percent in the next year.

Co-creation

While the principal focus of efforts to ensure the effectiveness of U.S. development cooperation over the past decade or so has been on high-level policies and principles, more recent efforts have extended to improving the mechanisms to design programs. At its heart, this has been the improvement of procurement and partnering processes through more open, collaborative instruments such as co-creation. USAID's latest Acquisition and Assistance (A&A) report found progress in procurement reform, with over $880 million through 314 awards using co-creation in FY 2020, an increase of 36 percent.

What is leading this momentum? According to Anar Khalil, a contracting officer at the USAID mission in Bangladesh, "We looked at past programs and realized that the traditional design process—from the moment we put together a concept idea to procurement—takes 18 months to two years. So by the time the project is awarded, these ideas are old." He is convinced that the agency's traditional method of project design limits innovation, creativity, and responsiveness because of cost and limited partner engagement. Originally a skeptic, today he is a true believer in the technique of co-creation for bringing together a variety of sometimes competing potential partners to come up with solutions.

Brian Bingham, of USAID's Global Development Lab, reports that the co-creation process generally brings deep value to projects and stakeholder relationships. "We found that co-creating with our partners establishes much better working relationships, better projects, and helps us know better what we’re looking for."

In the case of USAID Morocco, Fatimezzahra Massaq, president of an organization advocating for children with disabilities, says the variety of community, government, and private-sector participants results in a superior analysis of the problems. In addition to providing a more complete picture of needs and potential solutions for the region, co-creation offers an opportunity for participants to learn about other sectors. The variety of backgrounds brings fresh perspectives and open exchange of information that does not always happen with traditional partners who have been through the proposal-writing process many times.

These advances in the use of co-creation build on strategic and structural strengthening in recent years. For example, 77 Missions have submitted New Partnership Initiative (NPI) Action Plans that set goals for bringing new partners into procurement actions, including engaging new, underutilized, and local partners. Further, the A&A Bureau (responsible for procurement) has established senior regional advisors in the bureaus for Africa, Asia, and the Middle East to strengthen the A&A workforce and increase its familiarity with co-creation and adaptive management.

The agency has issued a Co-creation Field Guide that sums up the benefits of the approach. Co-creation can increase return on investment, bring together greater intellectual resources with a breadth of perspectives that can challenge assumptions, and create shared ownership. Further, it creates a space for USAID to engage actively with prospective partners to build trusting relationships, learn from local knowledge, break down traditional power dynamics, and hold candid conversations to improve programmatic designs and outcomes.

Adaptive management

Equally important to the effective delivery of development assistance, but at present in a more formative stage, is Adaptive Management—placing greater authority and flexibility in administering activities in the field. Development is not a static process, and in many developing countries, especially where instability and conflict reign, adaptive management allows implementers to adjust activities in what are often rapidly changing circumstances. The Congress in the Global Fragility Act of 2019 recognized the need, but did not provide the authority or mechanisms, for greater flexibility in implementation.

Arc of development effectiveness

Improving the effectiveness of U.S. development assistance is not a one-time fix. It is a continuous journey fueled by learning—learning from success and missteps. Understanding that development requires countries and societies to change, USAID leadership and staff have understood more than other U.S. government agencies that the successful pursuit of its mandate requires that its processes be constantly assessed and renewed through evaluation and learning. The current journey of change at USAID can be traced as far back as Congress enacting the New Directions legislation in the early 1970s and USAID under the Reagan Administration moving beyond a focus principally on economic factors to social analysis to account for the culture and social needs of a society.

The current path of reform was kick-started in the George W. Bush administration with the creation of the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) and PEPFAR—both built on accountability, transparency, local ownership, and data-driven decisionmaking. These principles were further advanced and extended to all U.S. development programs in the Obama administration and continued under the Trump administration.

The Biden administration and Congress have the opportunity to advance the journey further—to make locally-led development, co-creation, and adaptive management widespread approaches of U.S. development cooperation. One step would be to maintain co-creation as a priority for USAID and advance its usage by at least 20 percent each of the next several fiscal years. Another would be to move adaptive management from concept to reality—giving the field not just the authority but the mandate to adjust activities according to changing circumstances and learning. A third step would move USAID's procurement processes further away from static, overly prescriptive requests for proposals through the expanded use of more flexible procurement mechanisms like co-creation; Annual Program Statements (APS) (designed to better engage private sector participation); Statements of Objectives (SOO); Refine and Implement, Performance Work Statements (PWS); and Broad Agency Announcements (BAA).

The flexible global COVID-19 response funding is a perfect opportunity, and a daunting challenge, that provides Administrator Power and USAID with the best chance in years to demonstrate the full value of these innovative approaches to delivering development.

This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

TechTank Podcast Episode 18: What to expect from the Biden administration on antitrust regulation and Big Tech

Posted: 03 May 2021 08:32 AM PDT

By Nicol Turner-Lee, Bill Baer, Tom Wheeler, Nancy Rose

The nation's current antitrust laws have historical regulatory and enforcement precedents. Recent congressional hearings featuring Big Tech companies have begun to question whether existing laws are adaptable to current corporate behaviors and provide sufficient policing of deceptive or anti-competitive practices. In this episode of TechTank, host Nicol Turner Lee discusses the Biden administration’s potential approach to antitrust and competition policies, particularly those affecting Big Tech, with Brookings Fellows Bill Baer and Tom Wheeler, and MIT Professor Nancy Rose.

You can listen to the episode and subscribe to the TechTank podcast on Apple, Spotify, or Acast.

TechTank is a biweekly podcast from The Brookings Institution exploring the most consequential technology issues of our time. From artificial intelligence and racial bias in algorithms, to Big Tech, the future of work, and the digital divide, TechTank takes abstract ideas and makes them accessible. Moderators Dr. Nicol Turner Lee and Darrell West speak with leading technology experts and policymakers to share new data, ideas, and policy solutions to address the challenges of our new digital world.

This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

The prospects and limitations of United Nations election observation in Iraq

Posted: 03 May 2021 07:53 AM PDT

By Marsin Alshamary, Maya Nir

In October 2021, after nearly two years of intermittent protests that brought down the government of Prime Minister Adil Abd Al-Mahdi, Iraqis are posed to go to the polls for early elections. One of the main debates surrounding early elections is the degree of involvement of the United Nations. Many political elites have called for an observational role for the U.N., which is limited in scope and can have unintended consequences. Meanwhile, many of the protesters, who had boycotted elections in 2018 and who have concerns about integrity of Iraqi-run elections are calling for more extensive involvement through supervision.

Lurking underneath these demands is the expectation that U.N. involvement can ensure electoral integrity, help restore trust in democracy, and grant the elections legitimacy. However, the fact that both political elites and the masses who protested them have requested U.N. involvement raises the question: How effective are various U.N. electoral services at accomplishing these goals and what should be done?

Understanding election involvement in Iraq

First, let's clarify the meaning and scope of U.N. election services. There are eight types of electoral assistance that the U.N. can provide to a member state, three of which are rare.

The more common forms of electoral assistance are technical assistance, observation, expert panels, operational support to international observers, and support in creating a conducive environment. Technical assistance is one of the most popular forms of U.N. electoral services and has been provided to over 100 member states, including Iraq.

Electoral supervision, organization, and certification are the rarer forms of U.N. electoral services. For context, the last U.N.-supervised elections were conducted in 1989 in Namibia. In 2001 and 2002, the U.N. organized and conducted elections in East Timor. The U.N. also verified elections in East Timor in 2007 and in the Ivory Coast in 2010. Although these services are rare, the Iraqi public has been demanding U.N. supervision and at times U.N. organization for its next elections.

On the other hand, the government of Iraq requested electoral observation from the U.N. on November 20, 2020. A U.N. observer mission collects information on each phase of the electoral process and subsequently uses that data to present a report on behalf of the secretary-general on the quality of the election. Observation requires both a formal request by the government, as well as a resolution from the U.N. General Assembly or the U.N. Security Council. Critically for Iraq, the U.N. discourages observation missions in countries that have U.N. technical assistance already. It is important to note that since 2004, the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) has maintained an Office of Electoral Assistance, which provides strategic and technical advice to Iraqi institutions. In addition to this office, multiple international actors and organizations have observed various elections.

The government of Iraq's request is in line with a growing international acceptance and interest in election services, worldwide, not necessarily provided by the U.N. The Iraqi Independent High Electoral Commission (IHEC) has invited 54 embassies and 21 international organizations to send out electoral observers. Since the mid-1990s, over half of all elections in unconsolidated democracies have been observed by international organizations, including the U.N., the Carter Center, the European Union, and others.

On February 16, the secretary-general's special representative in Iraq, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, stressed to the U.N. Security Council the importance of upcoming October elections and asked for a response with regards to Baghdad's request for electoral observation by UNAMI. Hennis-Plasschaert cited interconnected crises in Iraq, including the economic crisis, the lingering ISIS threat, and social tensions, including the recent repression of public protests in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. In its seventh report on electoral preparations and processes, the special representative reiterated that no matter how the U.N. Security Council responded, "the elections will be Iraqi-led and Iraqi-owned at all times."

Understanding the limits

If the U.N. accepts the request for observation, it would satisfy the request of the government of Iraq, but would it satisfy the aims of the Iraqi public? The answer lies in the inherent shortcomings of electoral observation, which although substantial, can be mediated through proactive policymaking.

First, election observation is just that. It has an inherently limited purpose to observe each part of the electoral process, collect and analyze information, and provide a statement on behalf of the secretary-general on the quality and conduct of the elections. It cannot intervene in the process or mitigate election-day cheating. The U.N. and other entities cannot fundamentally improve governance practices through election observation alone. Moreover, this limited scope can also threaten local trust and engagement in the electoral process if the public misunderstands the scope of involvement to be larger than it is. The technicalities and limitations of U.N. electoral services are difficult to convey to the electorate.

The Iraqi public's demand for U.N. involvement stems from the assumption that the U.N. can ensure the integrity of the elections; many people are perhaps forgetting that the U.N. has been involved in electoral assistance in Iraq since 2004. The Iraqi public already has a crisis of faith with regards to its elections. If the U.N.'s involvement fails to coincide with elections that are perceived as free and fair — or if the U.N.'s statement following the elections is not in line with public perception — then faith in both the U.N. and in elections will be shaken. In order to mitigate this, IHEC and the U.N. would be well-advised to clearly outline the scope and limitations of the U.N.'s electoral role in Iraq.

Second, the most harmful unintended consequence of election-day observation is strategic manipulation. Although high-quality election observation can effectively deter election-day fraud such as ballot fraud, it can also induce more covert methods of cheating. Political entities intent on cheating might turn to rigging courts and administrative bodies, repressing the media, and other forms of pre-election manipulation. For this reason, observation organizations favor a combination of both long-term observation and a pre-election assessment mission, while political elites — for obvious reasons — favor only election-day observation. As Iraq's elections approach, signs of strategic manipulation are starting to appear, including the decline in press freedom and in civil society, as well as the intimidation of activists. It is vital that the decision to employ observation missions should not be delayed so that they are able to capture the pre-electoral environment in their data collection.

Setting expectations

Both members of the political elite and the electorate in Iraq have requested some form of U.N. involvement in the upcoming elections. Although an observation role seems to be inherently limited and to be favored by the political elite for that reason, it can still be used to promote free and fair elections and to restore faith in the electoral process and in democratization. For that to happen, the observation mission should be established in a timely manner to ensure observation of pre-electoral practices. The U.N. decision regarding the observation mission should not be delayed any further.

As for the public demand for supervision, it is unlikely to be met and the reasons underlying this should be clearly articulated. The U.N. has developed extensive ties with IHEC and with Iraqi institutions, but one of the things revealed by the protest movement is that it has failed to communicate properly with the Iraqi street. This is to the U.N.'s detriment, because unmet expectations will only serve to damage its reputation. Whatever decision that the U.N. reaches and whatever constraints it faces, need to be communicated to the Iraqi public, otherwise the public will continue to view the U.N.'s involvement as a panacea to its governance issues.

This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Provider charges relative to Medicare rates, 2012-2018

Posted: 03 May 2021 03:00 AM PDT

By Kathleen Hannick, Loren Adler

When receiving medical treatment, most patients are responsible for a flat dollar copayment,  coinsurance tied to a percentage of the negotiated price between their insurance company and the provider, or the full negotiated price if their deductible has not yet been satisfied. However, the uninsured and patients who are treated by an out-of-network provider may be liable for the provider's billed charge (or a portion thereof), which is a list price set unilaterally by the provider. In some cases, such a provider is actively chosen by the patient. But in others, such as for emergency and facility-based services that have been the subject of surprise billing debates, patients do not have a meaningful choice over their provider.

This analysis extends our previous work characterizing billed charges relative to Medicare prices across different physician specialties and incorporates recently-released 2018 data. We utilize data published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that reflect physician billed charges reported to Medicare (which appear to also largely reflect amounts billed to commercially-insured patients), now encompassing the years 2012-2018. We calculate mean charges relative to Medicare prices as well as the 20th, 50th, and 80th percentiles of this ratio for each physician specialty using the same methodology as our previous analysis. See the methodological appendix in Adler, Lee, Hannick, and Duffy (2019) for full details.

Consistent with previous work analyzing physician charges, we find notably higher ratios of charges to Medicare payment rates in specialties where surprise billing is most common (primarily emergency medicine and anesthesiology), relative to other specialties, and that this pattern continued in 2018. Not only are the average ratios in these specialties higher, but those specialties exhibit especially high charges at the 80th percentile.

Fig1Fig 2

The higher charges seen in these specialties likely reflect, at least to some degree, the fact that patients are typically unable to select their emergency physician or anesthesiologist, making it possible to surprise bill out-of-network patients as an alternative to contracting with insurance carriers, in which case physician collections are generally tied to the amounts charged.

Beginning January 1, 2022, however, the recently-enacted No Surprises Act will protect patients nationwide from surprise bills from out-of-network providers. Therefore, in addition to providing historical context, this analysis helps to illustrate the magnitude of protection being newly provided to patients.

The remaining figures and table break out this physician charge data for a broad range of specialties and, for emergency medicine and anesthesiology, across states.

Fig 3fig4fig5

This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Africa in the news: Mozambique, Chad, and climate change updates

Posted: 01 May 2021 04:30 AM PDT

By Leo Holtz, Tamara White, Christina Golubski

Mozambique's LNG project indefinitely suspended; OPEC maintains global oil demand projections

Following insurgent attacks in Mozambique in January and March, this week French oil giant Total has indefinitely suspended its $20 billion liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in the country's northern Cabo Delgado province. Stalled since January, Total had resumed work on the project in March. However, a resurgence of the violent Islamic State-linked militias reignited the security threat, causing millions of dollars of property damage. Given the challenges to the LNG project, the company suspended its contract under force majeure—a "provision that allows parties to suspend or end contracts because of events that are beyond their control, such as wars or natural disasters." By suspending their contractual obligations to gas buyers, construction companies, lenders, and the Mozambican government, Total hopes to protect the project in the long term and resume once the security conflict is resolved. Before this pause, Mozambique was projected to collect $100 billion from the gas project over 25 years. Now the country is facing a downgraded economic growth forecast.

In related news, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) announced Monday that it maintains its global oil demand forecast for 2021 despite the surging COVID-19 outbreaks in India, Brazil, and Japan. OPEC forecasts a rise in global oil demand by 70,000 barrels per day (bpd) to approximately 6 million bpd. However, oil prices dipped on Monday due to fears that the sharp rise in COVID-19 cases in India will dampen petroleum demand in the world's third-largest oil importer.

Chad's transitional military council meets resistance

This week, Chad's transitional military council named Albert Pahimi Padackev—the runner-up in this month's election—prime minister of the transitional government. The announcement was met with immediate dismissal by opposition leaders, who argue that the council's recent takeover after the death of President Idriss Déby last week amounted to a coup. In fact, on Tuesday, thousands of people took to the streets in Chad to protest the country's recent political developments, criticizing the transitional military council and calling for immediate civilian rule. The council subsequently banned protests, citing a period of mourning for the former president, and violent confrontations between security forces and the protesters ensued. On Tuesday, 27 people were injured and five died in the crackdown, and the prominent opposition leaders have been confined to their homes.

Meanwhile, the same day, Déby's son, Mahamat Idriss Déby, who has taken over as president, gave an address to the nation calling for partners to provide immediate aid to stabilize both the economy and political environment.

Former President Déby's death came last week after he sustained injuries while leading troops against rebel group Front for Change and Concord in Chad (FACT). Since the military council took over, FACT and the country's political opposition have resisted the move, calling the takeover a coup, but have said they are open to negotiations: FACT spokesman Kingabe Ogouzeimi de Tapol recently stated, "FACT is ready to observe a ceasefire for a political settlement that respects the independence and sovereignty of Chad and does not endorse a coup d'etat." Meanwhile, the military council has announced it will not negotiate with the group: On Sunday, spokesman for the military council, Azem Bermandoa Agouna, stated, "They are rebels, which is why we are bombing them. We are waging war, that's all."

For more on Idriss Deby's 30-year tenure as Chad's president, listen to last Thursday's episode of  The Current podcast. For more on the long-term security implications of the events in Chad for the wider region, see Alexandre Marc's commentary, "The death of Chadian President Idris Déby Itno threatens stability in the region."

Please also join Brookings on May 7 for a virtual expert discussion on the latest developments in Chad, as well as the regional implications and deeper policy dilemmas of counterterrorism, stabilization, and good governance.

African, US, and other global leaders have taken major steps to address climate change

On April 22-23, U.S. President Joe Biden hosted 40 world leaders at the Leaders Summit on Climate, including those of Nigeria, Gabon, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, and South Africa. At the summit, the U.S. agreed to reduce carbon emissions by 50 percent by 2030 and urged other countries across the globe to step up as well. Notably, at the summit, the Biden administration announced the launch of a Global Climate Ambition Initiative in which the U.S. will support developing countries in establishing strategies and policies to fight against climate change and mobilizing financing to drive the net-zero transitions and adaptations to climate change—all initiatives that could potentially help Africa.

Climate change is a global issue, of which the world's poor often bear the heaviest burden. Moreover, various climate-induced crises in Africa are exacerbating other risks in the region. The impacts of climate change are spilling over and adding to the existing instability in regions by increasing food insecurity, conflict, and displacement, according to a report released this week by the Africa Center for Strategic Studies. Specifically, the reports states, "by adding pressure to already strained environmental and economic systems, climate change exacerbates resource competition, intercommunal grievances, state fragility, and other vulnerabilities." For example, according to the United Nations, roughly 80 percent of the Sahel's farmland has degraded due to climate change, adding to the existing herder-farmer conflicts competing decreasing amounts of grazing land.

In related news, on Tuesday, April 27, the U.S. House of Representative's Foreign Affairs Committee held a hearing on the effects of climate change in Africa, wherein a number of expert witnesses highlighted that immediate attention is needed to address the issues. Witnesses discussed pressing climate issues such as the shrinking of Lake Chad, the impact of climate on stability, potential drops in coffee production in Ethiopia, and a way forward for Africa. To address the problem, they also recommended investing in climate-smart technology and grid resilience in countries like Nigeria and Ghana, among other initiatives.

This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

BREAKING: North Carolina automotive group acquires 7 Upstate dealerships

Breaking news from GSA Business Report Click here to view this message in a browser window. ...